Cricket history is full of talented cricketers and a number of them are exceptional. Let us try and figure out all time that have graced the field of cricket’s greatest cricketers. It doesn’t reflect on their personal greatness. It is merely about how cricketers they were. A increased cricketer does not necessarily signify a being that is higher compared to a cricketer in the record or vise versa. The listing is purely on cricketing skills.
1. Gary Sobers the best cricketer of all time that’s ever played with the sport of cricket that was exactly what the intuition suggests in the event that you take a look at his skills and statistic and as claimed by many. Ability to perform as long to score 365 runs in test cricket, hit six occasions over the rope in one over, wind up with a test average of over many of the great batsmen in the history of this game, become a fielder of class, and then having the ability to contribute to bowling, and you also left wondering if there is anything in cricket he couldn’t do and that’s what makes him the best all round cricketer and the greatest cricketer of all of them. He might have earned a spot in almost any team just. He was skillful and flexible . He’s reported to have bowled pace as well bowling. He chipped with his bowling and fielding in several times. The thing with rounders is that it’s similar to getting the privilege of playing an additional player in the group. Just look as to how many cricketers have scored a triple hundred in test match cricket. There are only 3 cases being hit in one within the history of class and International cricket. There have been hardly a dozen of cricketers throughout the history of the sport who may be hailed as all rounder of class and material, and Gary is regarded as the best of them. You continue counting. The list continues.
2. Don Bradman: Likely as strong a contender as Gary Sobers. The outstanding test average of almost 100 runs of Don Bradman makes him a standout cricketer. If you take into account the rarity of the accomplishment of having a mean of nearly 100 runs, Don Bradman are the best cricketer of all time. Where Gary scores him over is probably having the ability to contribute in each section of the game. Otherwise I don’t see any difference between Gary Sobers and Don Bradman as the two greatest cricketers of all time. But you wonder that he has to be unique to be able to ordinary 100 runs per innings. All those great batsmen throughout the history of the game who have played substantial number of evaluations has gone beyond a mean of in 60s, and nearly all of them so called greats have shrunk between 50s and 60s. To outshine the best in your category is quite unthinkable in almost almost any sport. In that way Don Bradman can be regarded not only the greatest cricketer of all time, but also the best sportsman of all time. To top it off he scored those almost 100 runs per innings in these days of hostile raw and pitches equipments. Everybody knows other cricket equipments and bats have developed over recent years. The difference between the bats of today and the bats of state about 20 decades ago is very noticeable. What type of bats Don Bradman should have played with. Many people say Don have document, and thus played on grounds. But even the worse of these pitches now among the numerous reasons on which cricket is played must be better than the pitches which Don played with. If this was the criteria, why none of the players of his age could afford a mean of into 70s.Today match prediction Provides you the complete details about the cricket prediction. All those contemporary greats of 90s and 00s could handle a typical in 50s with all those nicely developed bat and other cricketing equipment on hands free and batting friendly pitches. The pitches one used to see throughout the 70s and 80s were much difficult to bat when compared with the pitches ready now. If that is. He still remains the only player to have scored a 300 runs in a single day of a test match.
3. Imran Khan might have earned a spot in any leading side just as a bowler, also is among the greatest fast bowlers of all time. In addition he was as great as any great global batsman. He was a good fielder. He could acquire matches with his bowling, contribute significantly as a batsman, and could make substantial contribution as the leader of the bunch. He is considered the best among the greatest all rounders of his period that are amongst some of the best cricketers of all time. There have not been too many bowlers who were better than him and among the bowlers who have been slightly better than him, maybe not many are known for their batting abilities. Wasim Akram was better bowler than Imran, but Imran was dependable batsman than Akram, and may be Richard Hadlee was a much better bowler than Imran, but Imran surely hastens him as a batsman, also excelled everyone in that rounders category for a captain. A lot of folks will disagree with me on putting Imran Khan ahead of Vivian Richards. But it’s so difficult to accurately assess the ability of the players and their worth to the team. It’s like you can put Don Bradman before Gary Sobers without much fuss. You can as well place Vivian Richards ahead of Imran Khan in the list.
4. In the modern times, we had the pleasure of watching the likes of Gilchrist, Sehwag, Jaysurya, and occasionally Shahid Afridi destroying the bowling attacks, but none of them are proven to be as intimidating as Vivian Richards. To possess the speediest test hundred of all time with a mean of more than 50, and in one dayers, a mean of 47 runs in a strike rate of more than 90 speaks volume about the caliber of the guy. Not one of the above mentioned destructive batsmen have an average of more than 40 in comparison to 47 by Vivian Richards. In reality many other fantastic batsmen have less typical than Viv’s 47 and much lower strike rate compared to Viv’s strike rate of 90. He changed his batting style in spite of the condition of the game. He was also bowled and an outstanding fielder occasionally. One of the best fast bowler of his time Imran Khan has said that Vivian Richards is the only batsman who has scared him. Nobody else at the history of this game could play such as Vivian and thus is most likely the greatest batsman ever save Don Bradman and consequently he deserved fourth position at the list of the best cricketers of all time.
5. Adam Gilchrist: As a batsman, Adam Gilchrist was almost a Vivian Richards. In addition he would twice as a wicketkeeper. However, Adam Gilchrist is one of the greatest cricketers of all time. Adam Gilchrist has one of the highest strike rates in both forms of the game and contains an average to match the greats of the game. Adam Gilchrist was one of the chief reasons for its domination of the Australian cricket for the past decade and half. Adam Gilchrist was one of the three key players in the talent-laden Australian group. As a wicket-keeper batsman if someone can bat such as Adam Gilchrist, he’s certainly going to add substantially to the strength of the group. He performed some of the stunning innings in his career. His blistering hundred against Sri Lanka in the 2007 World cup, that Australia eventually won, the innings he played with at the semi-final of this IPL edition that his team finally acquired, the innings in Mumbai in the first variant of the IPL, and his fastest test hundred off 57 balls, that’s the second fastest hundred in the history of this game behind the supreme Vivian Richard’s 56 ball hundred, and many these innings make you wonder whether the Gilchrist has been the best cricketer of all time.
6. Wasim is considered as the most naturally gifted bowler by most former greats such as Allan Donald and Mohammad Azharuddin. It is said he can bowl six different types of balls in a single over. With the bat that he was capable of turning the match. Those 2 wickets on deliveries in the 1992 world cup final against England at a really important phase of the game pushed England out of this match. What an occasion to create the two deliveries of his career. You can anticipate the best cricketers to rise to the event at the greatest stage. You find a player like Adam Gilchrist playing with those knocks and sealing the win for his team. Wasim Akram is also the only bowler in the history of the sport to have captured hat-tricks as many as four times. Wasim Akram has won games for Pakistan singlehandedly. He shaped a bowling mix and they tormented a lot of batting line-ups. He was probably the greatest bowler of his time together with another person. Wasim Akram was clarified by McGrath himself in relation to himself as a increased bowler. If he was as good a bowler as McGrath and if you think about what he could do with all the bat, and you understand the value of Wasim Akram as a cricketer. From the 1992 World cup final before turning the match with his two magical balls, he was instrumental in placing a tough complete with his timely and explosive batting when he scored 33 runs off just 19 balls coming towards the close of innings. What a grand occasion for guy of Wasim’s quality to rise for his country and his staff. Many people may not know Wasim strike on a six that are timely to win the Nehru cup. People knew about Miandad hitting a six off the final ball when four runs were required off the final ball of their innings, to win. Pakistan required six runs to win against the past two chunks, and Wasim Akram hit a six off the first of these 2 balls and won the cup for Pakistan.
7. Richard Hadlee: Inarguably the biggest of New Zealand cricketers till date. Among the greats of all time who could make the quality XI for his bowling. New Zeeland had a very couple of match winners in their positions when Richard Hadlee was around, and it had been more often than not that Hadlee was their game winner. Richard Hadlee attracted as many laurels to New Zeeland cricket as any of the other greatest cricketers of all time have attracted to their own country. Plus, he was more than useful with the bat, and perhaps one of the batsmen in that New Zeeland team. One of the four great all rounders of all 80s and 70s. Richard Hadlee was believed by many as the best bowler among the four of his period. Richard Hadlee was effective at creating havoc. He won and saved games for New Zeeland along with his batting. In general, a very capable match winner.
8. Jacques Kallis: Some consider him to be the best cricketer ever ahead of Gary Sobers, also you will find many others that rate him as the best cricketer from South Africa. Kallis is similar to Srinath and a Rahul Dravid united into one unit. Kallis is an superb fielder besides being a useful bowler and a technically sound, dependable batsman. South Africa is given an quick bowler apart from being the lynchpin in the batting line up by Kallis. Kallis has carried the Southern African team gently and steadily for about decade-and-half and seems good enough to last for another two to three decades. To give a more significant picture one statistic that may critical is that he’s got a higher average in both test and one day cricket compared to Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara. Given that Sachin bats as an opener in one dayers and Kallis bats in the middle order, also for Kallis to have a larger average compared to Sachin Tendulkar is quite remarkable. Kallis though lacks on the flair aspect one day game, but has played crucial role in favor of the one day unit. Jacques Kallis is an outstanding fielder. He’s a normal slide fielder for Southern African and I recall his grab in Sharjah playing Pakistan running from someplace close to extracover to almost close to the boundary and then actually having to leap in the last minute to cover the distance with all the ball and hold on it.
9. Kapil Dev: Kapil Dev has been the greatest cricketer which India has ever produced. He was good with both bat and ball. He was the best batsman among the great all rounders of his time. It was his batting that transported India through aspect of the 1983 world cup. Kapil was first genuine fast bowler of Independent India contemplating Mohammad Nissar’s evaluation career ended before liberty, although he continued playing first class cricket for sometime following liberty. Kapil Dev was quite impressive as a hard hitting batsman and has been the pioneer of India bowling strike for nearly a decade-and-half.
10. Walter Hammond: Walter Hammond was an batsman with rare ability to play long innings. He is among those batsmen who consistently scored big and in an impressive strike rate. He was also a bowler who might make breakthroughs when required the most, to add to his skills. A test average of 58.45, 167 first course hundreds, and two five wickets hauls in test cricket prove he was among the best cricketers of all time.
11. Cases of 400, 500, and 300 are not any feats. Not cricketers compiled scores that are such as Brian did. That itself proves his skills. Likely Brian underachieved cause he was part of a weaker West Indian team. The strength and functionality of Team frequently has a bearing on an individual batsman’s performance. I am able to prove that. Look at Ponting’s performace when the Australian team was the most powerful group, and now consider Ponting’s performance using a declining Australian team. Likewise with overall improvement in the Indian group and together with the likes of Viru in the very best, the performance of Sachin has improved. Being the only player to have scored 500 runs in first class cricket, and to be the only participant in the history of this game to score 400 runs in a single innings of evaluation, and also to be one of these players to have played with most amount of double hundreds makes Brian Lara one of the most outstanding batsmen of all time, and easily the greatest batsman of his time. Brian Lara also to his charge has a couple of entries at around the top of the list for the largest number of runs scored in an over. No other batsmen in the history of this game has too many large scores as Brian has to his credit.If you compare his enormous scores to his contemporaneous rival Sachin Tendulkar, you will realize that Sachin despite enjoying a whole lot more cricket hasn’t shopped a 400, which Lara did twice, once in test, along with his 500 in initial course. Despite enjoying lesser number of matches Brian Lara has number of hundreds than Sachin Tendulkar. Sachin Tendulkar has a much better record in one day International cause he started the innings and every time had the chance to play all 50 overs.
Shane Warne: The greatest bowler of all time. Bowling spins. Shane Warne frequently did things. His famous ball to Mike Gatting that arrived sharply from out of the leg to turn in sharply and dislodge the bond is regarded as the ball of the century. He has regularly provided the crucial breakthroughs for Australia when they needed the most. From that point on, South Africa was on a downslide. With Glenn McGrath and Adam Gilchrist being other two of those three, Shane Warne was among the best three cricketers in that invincible team of the time.
13. Sanath Jaysurya: It was Sanath Jaysurya’s promotion to the opening slot throughout the 1996 World cup which transformed the Sri Lankan cricket team from a mediocre side to one of the best sides in the world. Even though Jaysurya failed in the semi-finals and portion of the 1996 world cup, it had been his exploits during the earlier part of the 1996 World cup that provided Sri Lankan team the momentum and optimism that they could win the World cup. Since that time Sri Lanka has remained among the teams on the planet. Besides being also an fielder, and a potent spin bowler Jaysurya was an effective and attacking batsman.
14. Muthiah Muralitharan: The the game has ever seen and the slow bowlers of all time with Shane Warne. Muthia Muralitharn can bamboozle most of the batsmen. Murali has most number of wickets. He is one.
15. Virender Sehwag: The main reason. He should be able to climb up this record by the time he is finished as an International cricketer. He’s left Sachin Tendulkar behind as a batsman and the second greatest cricketer ever . From the time he finishes. He can hit the ball so consistently that few could do about the pitch that was docile and against a bowling. Bishen Singh Bedi rates as the off spin bowler from the present team him.
16. Glenn McGrath I often got the impression that Glenn McGrath was difficult to play than Wasim Akram. That speaks volumes about the man’s skills. Glenn McGrath was all on the line and length. One of the three players of the late 90s and part’s Australian team of the 2000s. McGrath was a challenging bowler to bat against, and he destroyed the oppositions that are lesser. Among the chief reasons why Australia won three world cups.
17. Sachin Tendulkar is arguably among the best batsmen that the world has ever seen. Sachin Tendulkar was when he burst at the tender age of 16 on the global scene, a child prodigy who seized the imagination of the cricketing world. He possesses many batting records in both forms of the match. Some folks may say that Tendulkar was a better player than a number of the aforementioned in this listing, but I think that the folks above Tendulkar are either more talented than him or much more powerful than him. Sachin Tendulkar for all his talent has failed when it mattered the most. He’s one the ability, but cannot handle the pressure according to his ability as a cricketer. If approaching a 100 of the time for all his talent, get struck at 90s. I witnessed the entire series between Sri Lanka and India if Tendulkar was short of Brian Lara and the focus was on Sachin Tendulkar. Sachin Tendulkar failed that the series. When everyone expected him to rise to the occasion Sachin Tendulkar played well throughout the 2003 world cup, but failed at the final. He owns many batting records in cricket, and it is a tribute to his batting talent and endurance, but if you take a look at his ordinary in winning matches he is way behind the likes Bradman, Inzimam, Steve Waugh, Viv Richards, Ricky Ponting, along with Jacques Kallis to name a couple. Additionally if we don’t consider the minnows Zimbabwe Sachin Tendulkar and Bangladesh’s average compared to other batsmen of the time. He has fared in the first innings of a test match, but has not lived up to the expectation in the third or fourth innings and his ordinary in the third and fourth innings does not compare favorably with modern batting greats.
18. Malcolm Marshall: He is considered by the likes of Wasim Akram as the greatest fast bowlers of all time, but McGrath came ahead of him in this list because of pin-point precision. Unlike the West Indian fast bowlers, he was short, but was the quickest of all. When he bowled on the stumps he was unplayable. He might have ended up using wickets when he did not have to share the wickets in that great West Indian team of 1980s with as many as three other great fast bowlers, and ran line up several times.
19. Javed Miandad: Javed Miandad was the player in the gaming field. His never-to-say expire attitude makes him an standout cricketer. Javed Miandad could play long innings and has an superb technique for a batsman. He is among those players to have scored number of hundreds. Javed Miandad is perhaps the player during the history of test cricket to have maintained that the test average of more than 50 runs during his career. Javed Miandad also has an average of over 41 runs in one day format of the game. He played a key role in several Pakistan victories. He made significant contribution winning the 1992 World cup. Javed will be remembered to win the game when four runs were required to win one ball off. A World XI with no Javed Miandad or any all time list is incomplete.
20. Ian Botham: Ian Botham is one of those four great all rounders of 1980s and 1970s. He’s arguably among the three England cricketers. Ian Botham is still the top wicket taker in test cricket for England. He has produced some of the greatest performances of all time, both with the ball and the bat. Botham’s career can be broken into two halves. In the first half of his career he matched the performances of the 3 other great all rounders of his period or may have even excelled them, but in the next half of his career he ended up at the bottom of the four good all rounders of his time. Nevertheless he was really capable with both bat and the ball.
21. He has a test average of 56.94 and has gathered mountains of runs in first class cricket. Leading cricket magazine Wisden voted among the Top Five Cricketers of All Time him.
22. Keith Miller: Keith Miller is the only all-rounder and the biggest that Australia has ever made. Keith Miller was the only one or one of those couple all rounders that has almost the very same skills in both bowling and batting. He was equally effective with both bat and ball. He was very good bowler and a batsman.
23. Dennis Lillee: Dennis Lille was fast and among the fastest bowlers of all time. He formed one of the bowling attacks of all time with Jeff Thompson. He shares a world-record partnership for affecting variety of dismissals for caught by a keeper and bowled by a bowler, with wicketkeeper Rodney Marsh. He was included in the all-time XI and ESPN cricinfo of Bradman’s all time World XI. But I’d have rather preferred a Richard Hadlee or an Imran Khan rather than Dennis Lillee in most time XI.
24. As a batsman, I would rate Greg Chappell behind Brian Lara and Vivian Richards and on par with Sachin Tendulkar. Greg Chappell enjoying pace mastered as well as spin bowling on each side of the wicket. He produced some of the performances against possibly the attack in World Series Cricket. He’s second to none, if that’s any indication. Greg Chappell was also a useful medium pace bowler who could contribute with the ball.
25. Sunil Gavaskar the megastar of cricket. He must have been the inspiration for batting superstars that emerged during 80s and 90s. He’s Dilip Kumar of Indian cricket. His innings came from the very best bowlers of the time. He’s an impressive record against Australia, West Indies, and Pakistan, the three groups that had the best bowlers in the world at that time. His feats from the West Indian staff are mythical. To confront Malcolm Marshall and Michael Holding as opener and rating back to back hundreds speaks volume about quality of Sunil Gavaskar as a batsman. He is rated quite highly by the greats such as Vivian Richards Gary Sobers, and Imran Khan. He should be higher in the list if that’s an indication. A technician rather than a stroke player, he would not have satisfied for T20 and would not have been able to meet with with the requirement of day one dayers. And that is precisely the reason he is not and at 25 in 10 in this list.